Name:		libsafe
Version:	up to 2.0-11
URL:		http://www.research.avayalabs.com/project/libsafe/
Author:		Wojciech Purczyński <cliph@isec.pl>
Date:		March 20, 2002

Issue:
======

Libsafe provides ineffective protection against format string exploit
attacks that may be trivially bypassed.


Description:
============

The libsafe library protects a process against the exploitation of buffer
overflow vulnerabilities in process stacks. Libsafe works with any
existing pre-compiled executable and can be used transparently, even on a
system-wide basis. The method intercepts all calls to library functions
that are known to be vulnerable. A substitute version of the corresponding
function implements the original functionality, but in a manner that
ensures that any buffer overflows are contained within the current stack
frame. Libsafe has been shown to detect several known attacks and can
potentially prevent yet unknown attacks.


Details:
========

1.

Libsafe protection against format string exploits may be easily bypassed
using flag characters that are implemented in glibc but are not
implemented in libsafe. 

These flags definied in SUSv2 are not defined in C standard (quoting from
printf(3) manpage):

       '      For decimal conversion (i, d, u, f, F,  g,  G)  the
              output  is  to  be grouped with thousands' grouping
              characters if the locale information indicates any.
              Note  that  many  versions of gcc cannot parse this
              option and will issue a warning.   SUSv2  does  not
              include %'F.

       I      For decimal integer conversion (i, d, u) the output
              uses the locale's alternative output digits, if any
              (for example, Arabic digits).  However, it does not
              include any locale definitions with such  outdigits
              defined. (glibc 2.2 only)

Example exploit:

	printf("%'n", &target);
	printf("%In", &target);


2.

Libsafe *printf function wrappers incorrectly parse argument indexing in
format strings. They always assume that the n-th conversion specification
uses n-th argument and does not properly count real number of arguments
used. Thus, arguments, whose index numbers are above the total number of
conversion specifications, are not verified at all.

Example exploit:

	printf("%2$n", "unused argument", &target);

Total number of % format string used: 1 ("%2$n")
Number of argument used: 2 


Fix:
====

On March 18, 2002 new version of libsafe 2.0-12 has been released fixing
above security issue.